"Guilt is Burke's catchall term for tension, anxiety, embarrassment, shame, disgust, and other noxious feelings intrinsic to the human condition" (Griffin 292). According to Burke, there are two ways to redemption from the guilt, mortification and victimage.
Mortification is the confession of guilt and request for forgiveness. Victimage on the other hand is placing the blame, or scapegoating, on someone else for everything that is going wrong (Griffin 293).
The video above shows clips of former President Bush addressing the current economic situation along with our need/demand of energy. While Bush does not hold congress responsible for all of our nation's problems, he does blame it for our most current and prominent issues. Having watched the video, I can see that Bush's choice of redemption was through victimage.
Not once in his speech does Bush acknowledge any fault or wrong doing on his part, and maintains that he has made multiple attempts to right the wrongs of our country. It is evident that guilt(Burke's definition) was present in his speech through the tone and use of words. This reluctance to confess his guilt and take responsibility as the nation's leader (at the time), tells me that mortification is not a possibility here.
Burke believed that getting rid of guilt is the basic plot of the human drama and that rhetoric is searching for a perfect scapegoat at its root (Griffin 293). If that is the case, is Bush or anyone else for that matter, justified at all for seeking redemption through victimage? Or is this pattern throughout history enabling or encouraging people to follow others in placing blame rather than taking responsibility?